Download data and study materials from OSF
Catherine R. Albiston
University of California, Berkeley
Field period: 11/27/2011-03/14/2012
We develop an argument demonstrating how "family friendly" laws that prohibit discrimination against workers who take family leave can mitigate these biases. Drawing on theories from legal scholars, we contend that law affects society not only through punitive sanctions, but also by changing normative judgments. If law can change moral judgments, then "family friendly" laws should reduce the negative perceptions of caretakers along with the wage and promotion penalties they experience.
In an experimental evaluation of these predictions, participants evaluated 2 same-gender employees: EITHER a childless employee OR a parent, AND an employee who took family leave. All worked for the same firm, which, depending upon condition, was described as either: being covered by a legal mandate (the FMLA) or having no policy, legal or otherwise.
1) Mothers (who took leave or not) and mother's and father's who took family leave would be penalized relative to equivalently qualified childless individuals and relative to fathers who did not take leave when no family law was in place.
2) However, when a family friendly law was made salient, these biases would be reduced or eliminated.
1. variables measuring the following traits: capable, skilled, warm, intimidating, arrogant, committed 3. Recommended raise
2. Likelihood of promotion
Then a forced choice: Which of the employees would you recommend for promotion?
3. Recommended raise